4

In John 4:46-47, a nobleman goes to Jesus in Galilee and begs Him to heal his son who is near death (NKJV):

So Jesus came again to Cana of Galilee where He had made the water wine. And there was a certain nobleman whose son was sick at Capernaum.

When he heard that Jesus had come out of Judea into Galilee, he went to Him and implored Him to come down and heal his son, for he was at the point of death.

What prompted him to do this? There were no healings earlier. The first miracle in the area was turning the water to wine in a wedding feast. His healing ministry hadn't really started yet.

Update/Resolved: Yet there were miracles earlier. They were noted briefly in John 2:23, just in time for Nicodemus to mention them and the nobleman to hear of them.

5 Answers 5

4

The question is based on an argument from silence that is probably not valid. In John 2, after the wedding in Cana, we see Jesus going to Jerusalem for the Passover and cleansing the temple for the first time, and verse 22 tells us:

2:22 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did.

In the next chapter, Nicodemus comes to Jesus secretly and says:

3:2 [...] we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

Now we don't know what specifically these miracles are, or if any of them are among the miracles recorded in other Gospels, but the vast majority of Jesus' recorded miracles were healings. So the assumption in the question is probably unjustified. Although there are no specific healings recorded before this point, Jesus most likely was already known as a healer, but at a minimum we can say with certainty that He had a reputation as a miracle worker, and if you believe that "no man can do these miracles unless God is with him", asking for a healing is hardly a stretch.

6
  • The problem is that, if we believe the gospel harmonies, no miracles were performed yet until Cana, and that wasn't a healing. In the gospel harmonies, this meeting with Nicodemus evidently needs to be moved out of the order found in John.
    – Steve
    Commented 12 hours ago
  • I went by a harmony of the gospels instead of a more careful reading of John. Thanks for pointing these out.
    – Steve
    Commented 11 hours ago
  • @Steve "if we believe the gospel harmonies, no miracles were performed yet until Cana" - in fact, according to John it was the first miracle, but that was at the start of chapter 2, and the trip to Jerusalem, more miracles and meeting with Nicodemus only later in chapter 2 and in chapter 3, so it's not clear to me why you say the meeting with Nicodemus needs to be moved? These other miracles are likely not mentioned in your harmony because they aren't described in any detail.
    – user111403
    Commented 11 hours ago
  • I added my answer before reading yours, sorry. I upvoted yours accordingly. Commented 5 hours ago
  • @user111403 I will be posting another question that will be focused on harmony discrepancies that I see. It appears that several harmonies place Nicodemus early in Jesus' ministry before healings and miracles were reported. This means that John's early chapters are not strictly sequential, or the harmonies are wrong, or miracles and healings were taking place between chapters 1 and 2 that are unrecorded.
    – Steve
    Commented 5 hours ago
2

We are presented with a father in desperation with a dying son. If the doctors can't help, what does one even do? As a father, this would likely push him to seek any possible help, even from an unmet teacher with a growing reputation for miraculous power.

What do we know happened leading up to this?

These instances alone show that Jesus had plenty of opportunities for news of him to spread.

However, the initial question assumes that because no specific healing was recorded in Galilee before the nobleman's request, none had occurred anywhere. Under this assumption the nobleman's request would be without precedent. John 2:23 and 3:2 which are chronologically before the nobleman's request, invalidate this assumption. Jesus was already known as a miracle worker.

John presents the chronology like this:

??????Jerusalem miracles (2:23)
??????Nicodemus’s visit (3:1–21)
??????Journey through Samaria (4:1–42)
??????Return to Cana plus the nobleman’s request (4:43–47).

Thus, the nobleman likely did have knowledge of Jesus’ miraculous works (including healings) from His ministry in Judea/Jerusalem.

1
  • I completely missed 2:23. This helps.
    – Steve
    Commented 12 hours ago
1

These are the healing that may have occurred between the first and second signs recorded in the Gospel of John:

Location Event Matthew Mark Luke John
Cana Water made wine -- -- -- 2:1-12
Galilee Healing a leper 8:1-4 1:40-45 5:12-16 --
Capernaum Healing Centurion's servant 8:5-13 -- 7:1-10 --
Capernaum Driven out demons on Sabbath -- 1:21-28 4:31-37 --
Capernaum Healing Peter's mother-in-law 8:14-15 1:29-31 4:38-39 --
Capernaum Healing a multitude 8:16-17 1:32-34 4:40-41 --
Capernaum Healing a paralyzed man on sleeping mat 9:1-8 2:1-12 5:17-26 --
Galilee Healing a man with a shriveled hand on Sabbath 12:9-14 3:1-6 6:6-11 --
Galilee Healing a multitudes 12:15-21 3:7-12 6:17-19 --
Nazareth Jesus' rejection by Nazarene 13:53-58 6:1-6 4:16-30 4:43-45
Cana Healing a nobleman's son -- -- -- 4:46-54

As the table indicates, before the nobleman approached Jesus, He had already performed two major healings for large crowds. His reputation, which began with individual healings, quickly spread throughout the surrounding regions. This growing fame drew the attention of the nobleman, who came seeking healing for his son.

The event in Nazareth functions as a chronological anchor across the four Gospels. The healing of the nobleman's son took place after Jesus returned from Jerusalem and passing through Nazareth, where all four Gospels record His rejection. This moment thus marks a pivotal timestamp, suggesting that the events described prior to it had likely already occurred.

1

What prompted a nobleman in Capernaum to ask Jesus to heal his son?

Note Luke 4:37 (NWT):

So the news about him kept spreading into every corner of the surrounding country.

And because of this the nobleman went to seek out Jesus:

The story of the healing of the nobleman's son, found in John 4:46-54, recounts Jesus healing a nobleman's dying son from a distance. A royal official from Capernaum, whose son was seriously ill, traveled to Cana to seek Jesus' help to heal his dying son because he believed that Jesus could perform miracles, specifically healing his son who was at the point of death. He had heard of Jesus' recent arrival in Cana and traveled there, despite the distance, to plead with Jesus to come to Capernaum and heal his son,the nobleman's desperation stemmed from the severity of his son's illness, which was described as being "close to death" and out of desperation this nobleman hurried to Jesus whom he recognized that he was the only person and hope that his son would be healed. Just think and this showed his faith - the nobleman travelled a distance of about 20 miles) to find Jesus. No doubt the man had heard of Jesus other miracles and that is why he sought out Jesus and this Nobleman knew that Jesus would be able to heal his son

1
  • This reasoning is valid because this shows Jesus performed miracles before He had called His disciples, which begins in Luke 5. At the wedding feast in Cana, Jesus and His disciples were invited. So the gospel harmony chronology I consulted was in the wrong order.
    – Steve
    Commented 11 hours ago
0

It is not necessary to resort to a harmony of the gospels to explain this. I noticed a little known verse that sheds light on it:

John 2:23

23 Now while he was in Jerusalem at the Passover Festival, many people saw the signs he was performing and believed in his name.

In John's gospel, this happens right after Jesus overturns the money-changers temple. Thus, the author implies that many people witnessed Jesus performing miracles (called signs here) in Jerusalem during Passover. Many of these would have returned to the home towns to spread the word in time for the nobleman of Capernaum to hear of them.

1
  • Good one. Jason_ already supplied this gem.
    – Steve
    Commented 4 hours ago

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.